Previous Post:
'The non-observable Universe V'
Read the full article
here (via SKL repository).
Conclusions
According to a well-known type of realist standpoint, entity realism
(Losee, 1993; Harré,1986), we can divide the world in many ‘cognitive kingdoms’:
realm I asserts the existence of fully observable entities of Definition 1.1; realm
II corresponds to non-observable in the sense of Definition 1.2a and realm III is
made up of entities in the sense of Definition 1.2b. Much of what exists in the
Universe is and will always be non-observable, leading to the proposition of non-empirically
accessible causes in realm III. Examples of such entities abound in statistical
and quantum physics or in genetic biology to quote a few. By adopting such
realist view of the world, modern science has definitely showed that the scope
of scientific enquiry cannot be restricted to public available phenomena. Here
we have extended such a view to include meta-observable occurrences that would constitute
“realm IV”.
The phenomenological classification that we propose has 16 main
classes as the set of all possible types of phenomena in Nature, in accordance
to 4 distinct phenomenological properties: observability, visibility,
reproducibility and periodicity. These features are independent of any cause or
theory that is proposed to explain phenomena; although knowledge of the
occurrence conditions may impact the way they are perceived or reproduced. This
simple classification is a useful picture for the exposition of many the
features associated to a purely phenomenological description of Nature. The aim
of this text was to emphasize such features and to show that they may lead us
to wrong theoretical conclusions if class specific research methods are
misapplied across other classes.
Such classification ‘landscape’ (in the final entity-relationship
diagram of Fig. 1) must be remembered before any attempt to use a research
method exported from a predefined discipline. A research method is a theory
dependent procedure from which propositions or statements for certain phenomenological
classes are inferred. The theory associated to such a procedure is essentially
a language to treat events caused by established objects of study. In
principle, the research process popularly described as the ‘scientific method’ cannot
be said to be inadequate, but possibly that it can only be applied to a very
restricted subset of events, in particular to those that are minimally
reproducible or highly cyclical. On the contrary, one can argue that to demand reproducibility
(laboratory tests) at any cost poses a severe threat to the development of
theories to account for anomalies, because of an unjustified restriction of
scope it leads to, given the variety of phenomenological classes in Nature. It
also represents a threat to science understood in a more general way.
The characterization of certain diseases by the observation of
similar symptoms in large populations, mainly when an unknown disease cannot be
reproduced in the lab or is associated to symptoms not directly accessible, is
a standard methodology among physicians. According to our classification,
symptoms may be described as both public and private occurrences that require
direct or device assisted diagnostic procedures. And, just as a physician is
not admitted to discredit his patients complains about the symptoms (private
events), researches cannot undermined meta-observables associated to the
registration of many anomalies. The physician task is to arrive at plausible
mechanisms to explain all aspects of the disease, symptoms included, and to
propose a suitable treatment procedure. So, again a true science of anomalies
will only take place as plausible mechanisms for understanding meta-observables
become available, paving the way for the correct identification of other
sources. The new way of doing science will thus demand to accept meta-observables
(new sensory faculties) as the first step toward the correct treatment of
anomalies in the sense of Definition 8.
Will it be possible to devise a new research method to study
anomalistic occurrences? Such is the challenge of future science from the
methodological point of view. The development of such special methods will
require an open minded attitude on regard to the attribution of causes or
phenomenological sources. What is at dispute here, defying naturalistic
explanations, is the proposition of new sources to properly account for facts
representing anomalistic events. Thus, forcing naturalistic explanations may
lead to bad science contrary to what many skeptics believe.
References
Alvarado C. S. (2010). Investigating Mental Mediums:
Research Suggestions from the Historical Literature, Journal of Scientific c
Exploration, 24 (2), pp. 197–224.
Anderson, C., (1933). The Positive Electron, Physical
Review. 43, Second Series, No. 6., pp. 491-494.
Bartoshuk, L. M., (2000), Comparing sensory
experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate
genetic variation in taste perception. Chem. Senses, 25, pp.
447-460.
Baruss I. (2001), Failure to Replicate Electronic
Voice Phenomenon, Journal of Scientific
Exploration, 15(3), pp. 355
Bauer H. H. (1987), What Do We Mean by “Scientific?”, Journal
of Scientific Exploration, 1(2), pp. 119-127.
Bauer H. H. (1988), Commonalities in Arguments Over
Anomalies, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2(1). pp. 1-11.
Bauer H. H. (1989), Arguments Over Anomalies: 11.
Polemics, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 3(1) , pp. 1 – 14.
Bechtel W, (1990), Scientific Evidence: creating and
evaluating experimental instruments and research techniques. Proceedings of
the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol 1, pp.
559-572.
Bender, H. (1972). The phenomena of Friedrich
Jurgenson. Journal of Paraphysics, 6,
65–75
Braude S. (1986), The limits of influence:
Psychokinesis and philosophy of science, Routledge and Kegan, Inc.
Bohm, D. (1952).A suggested interpretation of the
quantum theory in terms of “hidden variables” – I and II. Physical Review
85(2), pp.166-179 and pp.180-193.
Brynie F. H. (2009), Brain Sense: the science of the
senses and how we process the world around us. Chapter 6. Amacon Books.
Carilli, C. L. (1995), Neutral Hydrogen 21 cm Quasar
Absorption Line Systems, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 16,
Suppl, pp. 163.
Casimir H. B. G.. (1948). On the attraction between
two perfectly conducting plates. Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands
Academy of Arts and Sciences. 51, pp. 793-5
Chalmers A. F. (1999), What is this thing called
Science?, Chapter 1, Hackett Pub. Co., 3rd edition.
Coleman P. F. (2006), A Unified Theory of Ball
Lightning and Unexplained Atmospheric Lights, Journal of Scientific
Exploration, 20(2), pp. 215-238.
Creath K. and Schwartz G. E. (2005), What biophoton
images of plants can tell us about biofields and healing, Journal of Scientific
Exploration, 19 (4), pp. 531.
D'Amico N., Lyne A.G., Manchester R.N., Camilo F.M., Kaspi , Bell J., Stairs I.H., Crawford F., Morris D., Possenti A.. (1999), The Parkes Multibeam Pulsar Survey: preliminary results, Preprint version available at arXiv:astro-ph/9911482v1
Dirac, P. A. (1928) , The quantum theory of electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.
A117. pp. 610-624.
Ellis, D. J. (1975). Listening to the ‘Raudive
voices.’ Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 48, 31–4.
Evers L. G. and Haak H. W., (2009), The
Characteristics of Infrasound, its Propagation and Some Early History,
Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies. Part 1, pp.3-27, DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5_1
Frame P. W. (2004), A History of Radiation Detection
Instrumentation, Health Physics, 87(2) pp. 111-135.
Franklin A., (2003), Are there really neutrinos?, An
Evidential History, Westview Press.
Gauld A. (1982), Mediumship and Survival. Heinemann,
London.
Giere, R. (1992), Science without laws, The Univ. of
Chicago Press.
Harré, R (1986), Varieties of Realism: a rationale for
the natural sciences,Oxford: Blackwell.
Hubel D. H. (1995), Eye, Brain and Vision, W. H.
Freeman, 2nd Edition.
Hull D. L. (1988). Science as a Process. Univ. of
Chicago Press.
Joad C. E. M. (1950), A Critique of Logical
Positivism, The University of Chicago Press.
Kaas J. H., (2007), The evolution of the complex
sensory and motor systems of the human brain. Brain Research Bulletin, 75,
Issues 2-4.
Kollerstrom N.
(2009), The naming of Neptune, Journal of
Astronomical History and Heritage, 12(1),
p. 66-71.
Kowal C. T. and Drake S. (1980), Galileo's
observations of Neptune , Nature,
287, p. 311
Kuhn T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific
Revolutions, Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press, chapter 10.
Lakatos I., Worrall J., Gregory C. (1980), The
methodology of scientific research programmes, Cambridge Univ. Press.
Losee J. (1993), A historical introduction to
Philosophy of Science, 3rd edition, Oxford Univ. press. Capter 18.
Morgan M. J., Adam A., Mollon J. D. (1992). Dichromats
detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats. Proc.
Of the Royal Soc. Of London, 248(1323), pp. 291-5.
Morris R. L. (1999), Experimental Systems in
Mind-Matter Research, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 13(4), p. 561.
Oreskes N. (1999), The Rejection of Continental Drift:
Theory and Method in American Earth Science, Oxford
University Press.
Pakdemirli M., (1993). Does religion contradict
science?, American Journal of Physics. 61, 201, doi:10.1119/1.17287
Papantonopoulos E, (2007), The invisible universe: dark
matter and dark energy, Springer-Verlag.
Passini A. (2003), From Observation to Simulations: a
Conceptual Introduction to Weather and Climate Modeling. World Scientific Cop.
Ltda.
Parnia S., Waller D. G., Yeates R. and Fenwic P.
(2001), A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and
etiology of near death experiences in cardiac arrest survivors. Resuscitation,
48(2) pp. 149-156.
Peebles, P. J. E, (2009), Phenomenology of the
Invisible Universe, arXiv:0910.5142v1
Penrose R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind: concerning
computers, minds and the laws of physics, Chapter 6, Quantum magic and quantum
mystery. Oxford Univ. Press,
Popper K. (1950). Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and
in Classical Physics, The British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 1
(2), pp. 117-133 and 2(3), pp. 173-195.
Popper K. (1968), The Logic of Scientific Discovery,
London: Hutchinson, Chapter 5 and Appendix x.
Quine W. V. O. (1951), The two dogmas of Empiricism, The Philosophical Review, 60.
Pp. 20-43
Rhine J. B. (1944). The PK Effect: Early Single Tests.
Journal of Parapsychology, 32, p. 293.
Rhine, J. B., Pratt, J. G., Smith, B. M., Stuart, C.
E., and Greenwood, J. A. (1966). Extrasensory Perception after Sixty Years.
Boston: Bruce Humphreys (originally published 1940).
Rinia E. J., van Leeuwen T., Bruins E. E. W. , van
Vuren H. G. , Anthony F. J. van Raan (2006), Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science,
Scientometrics, 54, Number 3,
Akadémiai Kiadó.
Ring K. and Lawrence M. (1993). Further evidence for
veridical perception during near-death experiences, Journal of Near-death
studies, 11(4), pp. 223-229.
Schmidt, H. (1974) Comparison of PK action on two different random number generators. Journal of Parapsychology, 38, p.47-55.
Schroter-Kunhard M. (1993), A review of Near Death
Experiences, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 7(3), pp.
219-239.
Sears D. W. (1975), Sketches in the History of
Meteoritics 1: The Birth of Science, Meteoritics,
10 (3), p. 215
Segre. E., (1994), Religion versus science? American
Journal of Physics 62, (296), doi:10.1119/1.17567
Shapin S., (1996), The Scientific Revolution, Univ. of
Chicago Press.
Swords M. D., (1993), A Guide to UFO Research, Journal
of Scientific Exploration, 7(1), pp. 65-87.
Swords, M. D. (2006), Ufology: What have we learned?, Journal
of Scientific Exploration, 20(4), pp. 545-589.
Szostak, R. (2005), Classifying Science:
Phenomena, Data, Theory, Method, Practice, Springer; 1 edition.
Toulmin S. (1974). Rationality and Scientific
Discovery in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science edited by K. Schaffer
and R. Cohen. XX (Dordrech: D. Reidel).
Turner D. J. (2003), The missing science of ball
lighting, Journal of Scientific Exploration, 17(3), pp. 435- 496.
Van Lommel P., van Wees R. Meyers V., Elfferich I.
(2001), Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective
study in the Netherlands, The Lancet, 358(9298), pp. 2039-2045.
Verschuur G. L., (2007), The invisible universe: the
story of radio astronomy, Springer Science and Business Media, LLC.
Whittaker E, (1953), A history of the theories of
Aether and Electricity, Thomas Nelson and Sons LTD.
Westrum R. (1978), Science and Social Intelligence
about Anomalies: The Case of Meteorites, Social Studies of Science, 8(4),
pp. 461-493.
